Probate in California is a judicial process that involves the administration of a deceased person's estate, typically requiring court supervision to ensure the proper distribution of assets and payment of debts. The process begins with the validation of the will, if one exists, followed by an inventory of the estate, payment of debts and taxes, and finally, distribution of the remaining assets to the rightful heirs or beneficiaries. This process is known for being lengthy and costly, with the duration varying greatly based on the complexity of the estate and potential legal challenges. On average, a straightforward probate case in California can take about 9 to 18 months, but more complex situations or disputes among heirs can extend this timeline significantly.

The probate process can be challenging for several reasons. Firstly, it imposes a financial burden due to various costs, including court fees, attorney fees, and executor fees, which can amount to a significant percentage of the estate's value. Secondly, the process is public, meaning that the details of the estate become part of the public record, which some families may prefer to avoid. Additionally, the lengthy duration of probate can be stressful for the heirs, as they await the resolution of the estate affairs, sometimes for years in complex cases. These factors often prompt individuals to seek alternatives to bypass or minimize the probate process.

To avoid or minimize the involvement of probate court in California, several strategies can be employed. These include setting up revocable trusts, which allow assets to be passed directly to beneficiaries without probate; designating beneficiaries through payable-on-death clauses for bank accounts and securities; and utilizing joint tenancy or transfer-on-death deeds for real property. Each of these methods can help ensure a smoother, quicker transfer of assets upon death, bypassing the lengthy and public probate process. Consulting with an estate planning attorney is advisable to understand these options fully and to choose the best approach for one's specific circumstances and estate planning goals.

State Assembly’s Revenue and Taxation Committee 가 680억 달러의 주 예산 적자 해소를 위해 California wealth tax bill 인 Assembly Bill 259를 재검토 중이다. 2023년 민주당 의원 Alex Lee가 처음 발의한 이 법안은 부유한 캘리포니아 주민의 순자산에 세금을 부과하는 것을 목표로 하고 있다. 2024년을 시작으로 순 자산이 10억 달러를 초과하는 사람에게는 1.5%의 세금을 부과하고, 2026년부터는 5천만 달러를 초과하는 사람에게는 1%의 세금을 부과할 예정이다. 캘리포니아의 진보적인 정책 환경에서 비롯된 이 세금 방침은 다른 주들에도 전례를 남길 수 있게 된다.

이 법안의 규정은 상세하고 광범위 하다. 올해의 세금 정산 기간을 기준으로 10억 달러 이상의 순 자산에 대해 연간 1.5%의 특별세를 부과하며, 2026년부터는 5천만 달러 이상의 순 자산에 1%에 세금을, 10억 달러 이상의 자산에 대해서는 0.5%를 추가로 부과하게 된다. 이 세금은 full-time 과 part-time 거주민, 그리고 최근 이주한 비거주자에게도 해당된다. 이 법안은 부동산을 제외한 사모 펀드 이익 및 해외 금융 자산 등에 광범위하게 적용된다. Franchise Tax Board가 비공개 자산의 가치를 평가하게 될 것이며 이는 캘리포니아 주 외부의 비공개 기업에도 영향을 미칠 수 있다.

이 재산세는 연간 216억 달러의 수입을 예상하고 있지만, 이 수치는 현재의 캘리포니아 재정 적자와 4년간 270억 달러 증가한 Medicaid 지출을 충당하기에는 부족하다. 게다가 확장된 유급 가족 휴가를 지원하기 위해 최상위 실질 소득세율을 13.3%에서 14.4%로 인상한다. 이렇게 세금 집행에 집중된 재정 접근은 주의 경제적 풍경에 영향을 미칠 수 있으며 이는 다양한 사업과 고소득자들의 이탈을 초래할 수 있다.

지속적인 세금 징수와 지출 사이클을 반영하는 Sacramento의 이러한 재산세 법안 접근은 계속되는 새 세금 도입을 통한 지출 증가 지원 패턴을 강조한다. 부유층에 집중된 징수에도 불구하고 이 재정 정책이 주의 증가하는 복지와 정부 직원에 대한 책무를 충분히 해소하지 못할 우려가 있으며, 이는 미래에 중산층에게까지 세금 부담이 확대될 수 있는 가능성을 제기한다.

The proposed California wealth tax bill, Assembly Bill 259, is being reconsidered by the State Assembly's Revenue and Taxation Committee to address the state's $68 billion spending gap. Initially introduced by Democratic Assemblyman Alex Lee in 2023, the bill aims to tax wealthy Californians' net worth. Starting in 2024, it would levy a 1.5% tax on residents with a net worth over $1 billion, and from 2026, a 1% tax on those worth over $50 million. This tax strategy, often originating from California's progressive policy environment, could set a precedent for other states.

The bill's provisions are detailed and expansive. It proposes an annual excise tax of 1.5% on net worth over $1 billion starting in the current tax year and extends to a 1% tax on net worth over $50 million from 2026, with an additional 0.5% on assets over $1 billion. The tax would affect full and part-time residents, as well as recent non-residents. It covers a broad range of assets, including private-equity interests and offshore financial assets, and exempts real property. The Franchise Tax Board would assess the value of non-publicly traded assets, potentially impacting private businesses outside California.

The wealth tax is expected to generate an estimated $21.6 billion annually, yet this figure falls short of covering California's current fiscal deficit and the rising Medicaid spending, which has increased by $27 billion over the past four years. Additionally, the state is raising the top effective marginal tax rate on wage income to 14.4%, up from 13.3%, to fund expanded paid family leave. This fiscal approach, focusing heavily on taxation, might affect the state's economic landscape, potentially driving away businesses and high earners.

Sacramento's approach with the wealth-tax bill highlights a persistent pattern of introducing new taxes to support increased spending, reflecting a continuous tax-and-spend cycle. Despite the focus on taxing the wealthy, there is a concern that these fiscal policies may not sufficiently address the state's growing welfare and government-worker obligations. This raises the possibility that, in the future, the tax burden could extend to the middle class as well.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2023-09 (the “Update”) to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures.  The amendments in this Update address investor requests for more transparency about income tax information through improvements to income tax disclosures primarily related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information.  This Update also includes certain other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures.

Effective Date

For public business entities, the Update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024.  For all others, the Update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025.  Early adoption is permitted, and the Update shall be applied on a prospective basis.  Retrospective application is permitted.

Rate Reconciliation

Public business entities must disclose a tabular reconciliation using both percentages and amounts, broken out into specific categories with certain reconciling items at or above 5% of the expected tax further broken out by nature and/or jurisdiction.

All other entities must provide qualitatively disclosure of the nature and effect of significant reconciling items by specific categories and individual jurisdictions.

Income Taxes Paid

Both public business entities and all other entities must disclose income taxes paid (net of refunds received), broken out between federal (national), state/local and foreign. Disclose the income taxes paid (net of refunds received) to an individual jurisdiction when 5% or more of the total income taxes paid (net of refunds received).

Other Disaggregated Disclosures

Both public business entities and all other entities must provide Income (or loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, broken out between domestic and foreign, and Income tax expense (or benefit) from continuing operations, broken out between federal (national), state/local and foreign.

Removed Disclosures

The Update removes disclosure requirements for all entities related to: reasonably possible significant changes in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of the reporting date; and the cumulative amount of each type of temporary difference for which a deferred tax liability has not been recognized (due to the exception to recognizing deferred taxes related to subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures).

Detail of the Update can be found in the attached ASU 2023-09.

ASU 2023-09